Bob Menendez and the Curse of Egypt


Tutankhamun was a young pharaoh who ruled in the 18th Dynasty of Egypt (1332-1323 BC). He was about 9 years old when he ascended the throne and died mysteriously at the age of 19. Tutankhamun's reign, known as the Amarna Period, is known for his efforts to return Egypt to its former religious and cultural order after Akhenaten introduced the monotheistic Atonite faith. At the time, Egypt was renowned for its wealth, art and architecture. 

Tutankhamun's tomb was discovered by Howard Carter in 1922, providing important insights into Egypt's ancient history and cultural heritage. Several strange events during the discovery and in the years that followed led to the legend of the "Curse of Tutankhamun".

This mysterious story began in 1922 when British archaeologist Howard Carter and his team discovered the tomb of Tutankhamun, the young pharaoh of Ancient Egypt. Shortly after the opening of the tomb, excavation financier Lord Carnarvon died suddenly from high fever and blood poisoning. After Carnarvon's death, the message allegedly written on the door of the tomb, "Death will spread its wings to those who disturb the Pharaoh's peace", caused a media sensation. This, coupled with the similar deaths of others who entered the tomb, spread the legend of the curse rapidly.

Carter's close aide, Arthur Mace, fell ill after the discovery of the tomb and died within a few years. American railroad tycoon George Jay Gould, who visited the tomb, died of a fever soon after. Hugh Evelyn-White, one of the archaeologists working at the tomb, became depressed and committed suicide after it was opened.

Interestingly, strange illnesses and sudden deaths have been reported among the workers and archaeologists who worked on Tutankhamun's tomb. At least 11 members of Carter's team are known to have died of various causes within a decade of the opening of the tomb. The myth or reality debate has been going on for over 100 years.


Interestingly, the Egyptian curse also seems to affect Senator Bob Menendez. It has nothing to do with Tutankhamun, of course. But it has a lot to do with Egyptian gold bullion. Why? Let's start our journey through history, politics and geopolitics.


Bob Menendez, in full Robert Menendez, is a politician representing the state of New Jersey in the United States of America. He was born on January 1, 1954 and is a member of the Democratic Party.  Early in his political career, he served in the New Jersey House of Representatives and the New Jersey Senate, and was mayor of Union City. Menendez's real rise in his political career began in 1992 when he was elected to the US House of Representatives. Since 2006, he has served in the US Senate. Previously, Bob Menendez was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, but was forced to resign due to corruption and bribery allegations against him, but he refused to resign from the Senate and has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing or unethical behavior!!!


Menendez's career took off, especially in the early 1990s, and with it some controversy about his involvement in corruption. In 2015, in particular, he faced federal corruption charges, but in 2018 the case was curiously dragged out due to 'juror unanimity' and the charges against him were eventually dropped. The jurors struggled to reach a consensus on whether Menendez's actions amounted to bribery and corruption or friendly assistance. Please note, this is not an acquittal in the legal sense, it is a matter of interesting twists and turns during the trial and ultimately juror disagreements!!! During the trial, there were many fierce arguments and fights between prosecutors and lawyers. Perhaps most importantly, in April 2018, following the trial, the United States Senate Select Committee on Ethics "strongly admonished" Menendez for accepting gifts from donor Salomon Melgen without committee approval, failing to disclose certain gifts, and using his position as a senator to advance Melgen's interests. This warning is a final judgment of conscience that cannot be proven in court.

Bob Menendez is married to Nadine Arslanian. Nadine Arslanian is an American businesswoman of Armenian descent. She is known as an important supporter of Menendez in his political career. 

The corruption allegations he has had to face for so long could seriously affect Menendez's political career and public image. In 2023, Bob Menendez and his wife Nadine Arslanian faced federal corruption charges. In September 2023, the couple was accused of taking bribes. They allegedly used their political influence to offer favors from some business people in exchange for gold, cash and luxury vehicles.

Federal prosecutors allege that the Menendez couple received bribes from

  • Wael Hana: Menendez allegedly bribed him to take diplomatic initiatives in favor of the Egyptian government.

  • Jose Uribe: Allegedly bribed Menendez in exchange for help on various issues.

  • Fred Daibes: Allegedly bribed Menendez to solve some of his judicial problems.

It is known that Menendez holds an influential position as the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and has been active on human rights, democratic reforms and international security issues throughout his career. However, it is also noted that Menendez has been associated with various controversies and rumors throughout his political career. These rumors include diplomatic overtures in favor of the Egyptian government, political donations and lobbying, illegal activities in the Dominican Republic, and allegations linked to Medicare fraud.

Bob Menendez's relationships with political donors and lobbyists have been criticized at various points in his political career. Menendez is thought to have used his influence to benefit these individuals.

Particularly noteworthy in the context of their relations with political donors and lobbyists are the following cases:

  1. The Dr. Salomon Melgen Affair: Dr. Melgen is a longtime friend of Menendez and a major campaign donor. Charged with Medicare fraud, Melgen's lawsuits alleged that Menendez used his influence in the Senate on his behalf. Menendez argued that his actions were legal and intended to help his friend.

  2. Dominican Republic Vacations: Menendez used Melgen's private plane and vacation home in the Dominican Republic and failed to report some travel expenses. This led to allegations that Menendez was protecting Melgen's interests. Menendez attempted to rectify the situation by reimbursing the travel expenses.

  3. Port Miami Container Dredging Dispute: Menendez allegedly pressured the US government to protect Melgen's interests in a port security contract in the Dominican Republic. In Melgen's dispute with the Dominican government over container dredging work at Port Miami, Menendez allegedly exerted pressure.

  4. Federal Corruption Case (2015): Menendez faced federal corruption charges in 2015. The allegations included that he used his political influence to help Melgen's personal and business affairs in exchange for gifts and campaign donations from Melgen. In a 2017 trial, the jury could not reach a verdict and the case was dismissed!!!

Menendez argued that his actions were within the law and aimed to help his friends. However, in the court of public opinion, these relationships and allegations have caused Menendez to question his ethical and legal boundaries.

Bob Menendez is a politician with a critical attitude in his relations with Turkey. In the current political process, this attitude has always been met with a question mark by Turkey, and it has not been understood how and why the problems in relations have evolved in such an adverse manner. Here are some of Menendez's attitudes and views on Turkey:

  • Recognition of the Armenian Genocide: Menendez has played an active role in the official recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the United States. In 2019, the US Senate passed a resolution officially recognizing this genocide. This resolution was harshly criticized by Turkey.

  • Eastern Mediterranean and the Cyprus Issue: Menendez has been critical of the energy resources in the Eastern Mediterranean and Turkey's Cyprus policies. He described Turkey's drilling activities off the coast of Cyprus as illegal and argued that these activities should be stopped. He also emphasized that the sovereign rights of the Republic of Cyprus should be protected.

  • Turkey's Domestic Politics and Human Rights: Menendez has also been critical of human rights violations and democratic backsliding in Turkey. In particular, he has criticized the crackdown on journalists, academics and dissidents. He has expressed concern about political imprisonment and freedom of the press in Turkey.

  • S-400 and F-35 Crisis: Menendez harshly criticized Turkey's purchase of the S-400 air defense system from Russia. He stated that this situation negatively affected the US participation in the F-35 fighter jet program. He supported the imposition of sanctions against Turkey.

  • Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: Menendez is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In this position, he has supported and led several bills and draft resolutions on Turkey.

Menendez's critical stance towards Turkey was received negatively by the Turkish government and contributed to diplomatic tensions between the two countries. However, although Menendez claims that his political positions are shaped in line with the principles of human rights, democratic values and international law, the aforementioned corruption, bribery, lobbying activities and, finally, the fact that his wife is of Armenian origin cause these positions to be seriously questioned.

Regarding Bob Menendez's harsh and critical positions on Turkey, it is generally believed that Menendez may have been influenced by certain lobbies and diaspora groups. Here are some of the rumors and allegations against him:

  • Relations with the Armenian Lobby: Menendez's efforts for the recognition of the Armenian Genocide and his criticisms against Turkey have led some circles to claim that he is under the influence of the Armenian lobby. It is argued that Menendez has strong ties with the Armenian diaspora and lobby and defends their interests. In particular, his active role in the recognition of the Armenian Genocide seems to support these allegations.

  • Greek and Cypriot Lobbies: Menendez's positions on the Eastern Mediterranean and Cyprus have led to allegations that he is supported and directed by the Greek and Cypriot lobbies. His opposition to Turkey's drilling activities off the coast of Cyprus and his defense of the sovereign rights of the Republic of Cyprus are considered as a policy in line with the interests of these lobbies.

  • Anti-Turkey Attitudes in US Domestic Politics: It is argued that Menendez's criticism of Turkey is part of a general anti-Turkey trend in US domestic politics. In particular, it is argued that due to some of Turkey's independent steps in foreign policy and its relations with Russia (e.g. the purchase of the S-400 defense system), some politicians in the US have adopted a harsher attitude towards Turkey.

  • Israel Lobby According to some allegations, Menendez's criticism of Turkey may be under the influence of the Israel lobby. The sometimes tense relations between Turkey and Israel and Menendez's support for pro-Israeli policies have led to such rumors.

Although the points I have tried to summarize so far are not based on conclusive evidence, they have been on our minds within the framework of the events that have taken place. For this reason, when I examine the issue in a little more detail, the picture that appears before me really raises our suspicions. In order to bring this issue to your attention, I find it appropriate to analyze Turkey-US relations.


Turkey-US relations have gone through many periods throughout history and have been shaped by various factors. The conclusion of the Second World War in favor of the US-led front and the development of two-front world politics on the US-USSR axis led to military polarization and brought about two main military pacts, NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Although Turkey remained neutral during the Second World War, it joined NATO after the war and became one of its first members. It is still the largest military power among NATO countries after the United States and the most strategic member of the alliance. In addition to being a NATO member, Turkey pursues a cosmopolitan foreign policy, maintains good relations with Russia and China, and takes serious steps towards independence by developing its own national solutions, especially in the military defense industry. This situation has been meticulously monitored by the United States, and when we take into account the situations in which the national interests of the two countries clash, we can see that politically, the relationship between the two countries has been on an up-and-down course since 1950. In the end, it should be recognized that there are very complex and complicated relations between the two countries.


If we turn the state of relations and fluctuations in diplomatic relations between Turkey and the US from 1950 to 2020 into a numerical graph for clarity, and if we assign a score between 1 and 100 on the Y axis (where 1 indicates the worst situation and 100 indicates the best situation), and if we place the years on the X axis, we see the following graph;


It should be kept in mind that this graph does not reflect all the relations between the two countries, but rather the general perspectives and the general trend. For example, the graph has been softened in order not to distort the general trend of the deteriorating relations between the two countries after the 6th Fleet soldiers visiting Turkey in 1969 were thrown into the sea and during the 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation.

As can be seen, relations, which had been on an upward trend until the 1990s, were severely affected after this date and started to decline. In the last 10-15 years, Turkey-US relations have deteriorated significantly due to various reasons. Some events and political developments during this period have increased tensions between the two countries. Here are the main reasons for the deterioration of these relations:

  • The Pastor Brunson Affair: Following the coup attempt in 2016, American pastor Andrew Brunson was arrested in Turkey and put on trial for espionage and alleged links to terrorist organizations. Brunson's arrest led to a deterioration in relations with the US. The US imposed economic sanctions on Turkey after Brunson was not released.

  • Allegations of Interference in Turkey's Internal Affairs: Turkey has accused the United States of interfering in its internal affairs. These allegations increased especially after the Gezi Park protests in 2013 and the attempted coup in 2016. The Turkish government has expressed its belief that the US had a hand in these events, which has negatively affected relations.

  • Relations between FETÖ and the US: Turkey blames the United States for the presence of Fetullah Gulen in the US. Blaming the Fetullah Terrorist Organization (FETO) for the July 15, 2016 coup attempt has led to mistrust and tension between the two countries.

  • PKK/PYD and the US Relationship: The US support for the YPG/PYD forces in Syria has been met with reaction by Turkey. Turkey argues that the YPG/PYD is an extension of the PKK and emphasizes that these groups should be considered as terrorist organizations.

  • Embargoes and Economic Sanctions: The US imposed economic sanctions on Turkey. These sanctions negatively affected economic relations between the two countries due to the non-release of Pastor Brunson, the purchase of the S-400 air defense system and Turkey's trade relations with Iran.

  • S-400 Crisis: Turkey's purchase of the S-400 air defense system from Russia has led to a serious crisis with the United States. The US stated that the S-400 system was incompatible with NATO systems and announced that Turkey would be excluded from the US F-35 program with this purchase.

These factors have led to erosion of trust and political tensions in Turkey-US relations. In particular, the recent Israeli massacres in Gaza and Palestine, and the unconditional support of the US, have led to a renewed strain in relations.12 These complex dynamics provide an important framework for the future cooperation between the two countries. 

Let us now elaborate on some of the more complex of these reasons;

S-400 Crisis

Turkey has been facing the need for a modern air defense system for many years. However, negotiations with NATO allies failed to find a solution to meet this need. Regional developments and the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011 led to an increased threat to Turkey.

Turkey decided to purchase an air defense system to counter the growing external threat. Naturally, it first communicated the situation to its main ally, the United States, and requested the Patriot System. However, this request was rejected by the US. This prompted Turkey to look for other countries to meet this need, and in 2017, Turkey began negotiations with Russia to purchase the S-400 air defense system. In December 2017, a $2.5 billion deal was signed and Turkey purchased the S-400 systems. 

The United States argued that the S-400 systems were incompatible with NATO's F-35 fighter jets and removed Turkey from the F-35 program. However, similar Russian air defense systems were already in use in many NATO countries.

In December 2020, the US imposed sanctions against Turkey under CAATSA. However, Turkey argued that the S-400 systems were necessary for national security and stated that it would maintain its independent defense policies.

On the other hand, Turkey has turned to alternative collaborations in the defense industry and increased its efforts to develop indigenous defense systems. By 2024, Turkey's national and indigenous layered air defense system was fully commissioned, the first unmanned fighter jet, “the Red Apple”, entered mass production, and Turkey's 5th generation fighter jet Kaan started its maiden flights. This resulted in Turkey's rise to 3rd place in the world in modern warfare technologies after the US and China. The US sanctions and the decision to be excluded from the F-35 program accelerated Turkey's strategic changes in the defense industry and the movement towards full independence in defense systems. 

The Case of the NATO Generals Inside Turkey

The "NATO generals" affair within Turkey has generated controversy about the relationship of some high-ranking officers in the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) with NATO and how they serve Turkey's national interests. This issue has received more attention, especially after the July 15, 2016 coup attempt.

After becoming a member of NATO in 1952, Turkey took important steps to align its Turkish Armed Forces with NATO standards. This process required Turkish officers to serve in NATO missions and receive international military training.

As part of NATO membership, many Turkish officers received training in NATO countries and served in various NATO missions. This led to the formation of a segment within the Turkish Armed Forces that was seen as pro-NATO.

After the July 15, 2016 coup attempt, it was alleged that some high-ranking officers in the Turkish Armed Forces had close ties with NATO and that generals known to be pro-Western played a role in the coup attempt. As it will be recalled, over 250 civilian casualties occurred during this coup attempt.

Due to the fact that these officers had served in NATO and had close ties with the West, some people claimed that they had participated in the coup attempt. Following the coup attempt, there were large-scale purges in the Turkish Armed Forces. Thousands of officers and non-commissioned officers were dismissed or arrested, and many high-ranking officers suspected of having links to NATO were also dismissed.

The restructuring of the TAF led to fundamental changes in the command structure and the training system. These changes affected the TAF's future operational capacity and internal dynamics, but also had significant benefits in terms of full independence.

FETÖ and the US

FETÖ (Fetullahist Terrorist Organization) is an organization accused by Turkey of attempting to take over the country by operating covertly at various levels of the state, including the attempted coup d'état on July 15, 2016, and is considered to be affiliated with the United States, the CIA and Mossad. The leader of this organization, Fetullah Gülen, has been residing in Pennsylvania, USA since 1999.

Gülen traveled to the United States in 1999, citing health problems, and has lived in Pennsylvania ever since. He obtained a permanent residence permit (Green Card) in the U.S. and continued to live here. FETÖ has established an extensive educational and social network in the US. It has charter schools and foundations. It carries out lobbying activities in the US. The fact that FETÖ supporters currently enjoy special privileges in the U.S. and are under special protection by the U.S. government strengthens Turkey's claims. Turkey accuses the US of protecting and supporting FETÖ. Extradition requests and legal proceedings have led to strained relations.

It has been proven that officers directly directed by FETÖ were behind the coup attempt in Turkey. Thousands of people were arrested. Turkey demanded the extradition of Gülen from the US, but the US administration rejected the extradition request.

At this point, I present the following words of Henry Kissinger, which have gone down in history, for your information without comment; "America is strong for two reasons. It finds and kills traitors in its own country. It finds traitors in other countries and uses them."

PKK/PYD and the US

The PKK and PYD terrorist organizations have been a major source of tension in relations between Turkey and the United States. The PKK is globally recognized as a terrorist organization. The PYD and its armed wing, the YPG, are a renamed version of the PKK. Despite this, the PYD and the YPG have been allies of the US in the Syrian civil war. Meanwhile, what the US is doing in a civil war 10,000 kilometers away is another critical issue.

The PKK was founded in 1978 under the leadership of Abdullah Öcalan and has been waging an armed struggle against Turkey since 1984. The US has designated the PKK as a terrorist organization and has occasionally provided support to Turkey in its fight against the PKK. However, this support has been seriously contradicted by the US relationship with the PKK's Syrian branch, the PYD/YPG.

The PYD was founded in 2003 as the Syrian branch of the PKK. The YPG, the armed wing of the PYD, became more active with the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011. The US chose the YPG as an ally in the fight against ISIS. Under the name Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the YPG received weapons, training and logistical support from the US.

Turkey considers the YPG as an extension of the PKK. It considers the YPG's presence in Syria and the support it receives from the US as a threat to its national security. Turkey has carried out many military operations against the PKK/PYD/YPG/SDF in Syria within the framework of reciprocity engagement in many attacks on its territory within Syria. In the meantime, Turkey knows and says that these different designations consisting of these 3 letters were invented by Brett McGurk, one of the names shaping the US Middle East policy, in order to confuse, whereas they are all PKK.

The Impact of the Events in Gaza on Turkey-US Relations in the Israeli-Palestinian Axis

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, especially the events in the Gaza Strip, has occasionally caused tensions in relations between Turkey and the United States. Turkey has historically supported the Palestinian cause and defended the rights of the Palestinian people. In particular, the government led by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has taken a clear stand against the Palestinian struggle for independence and against Israel's policies. Turkey has provided massive aid in response to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and has carried out various projects to support Palestinians in the region. However, Israel's military operations against Gaza and the Mavi Marmara incident negatively affected Turkey-Israel relations and led to a crisis that also affected Turkey-US relations. The US, as one of Israel's strongest allies, has provided extensive support for Israel's security. This increased Turkey's criticism of the US and led to diplomatic clashes. Bilateral relations have at times been cold and tense. These events have been an important factor that negatively affected Turkey-US relations. Regional policies also affected these relations and led to a crisis of confidence between the two countries. The events in the Israeli-Palestinian axis have negatively affected the relations between Turkey and the US.

US Need to Improve Relations with Turkey

The tensions in world politics in recent years, especially the growing influence of Russia and China, have made it necessary for the US to reconsider and improve its recently deteriorating relations with its NATO ally Turkey. So, why does the US need Turkey's support and what steps can US take to improve these relations?

First of all, I would like to point out that according to a study conducted by the US-based Global Firepower, Turkey is the 8th most powerful army in the world and the 3rd most powerful army in NATO. In terms of experience, the Turkish Land Forces are at the top of the world. In recent years, the Turkish Defense Industry has also made great strides in new military technologies. In terms of military power, Turkey is an indispensable ally for the United States.

In recent years, Russia and China have made great progress in both military and economic fields and have started to play a more prominent role in global politics. Russia has posed a major threat to NATO, especially with its military intervention in Ukraine and its influence in Eastern Europe. China, on the other hand, has increased its global influence with its military presence in the South China Sea and projects such as the Belt and Road Initiative.

These developments have led the US to rely more heavily on its NATO allies, especially strategically located countries like Turkey, to protect its global strategic interests. Turkey has a critical importance for regional security and stability due to its geographical location and military capacity. Turkey's NATO membership and cooperation with the US is seen as a counterweight to the growing influence of countries such as Russia and Iran in the region. It should also be noted that Turkey is an important partner for Europe and the United States in the migrant crises and the fight against terrorism.

Recent tensions in world politics have required the United States to reassess its relations with its NATO ally Turkey. Turkey's strategic importance and military capacity are critical to US regional and global objectives. To improve relations with Turkey, the United States must take steps in the diplomatic, economic and defense spheres and rebuild trust between the two countries.

Having made these assessments and analyses, I would like to draw a connection between the historical course of Turkey-US relations and Bob Menendez's progress on the political scene. In fact, although this may seem like a conspiracy theory, my belief in this matter is clearly established.

In order to make it easier to understand the issue, I have tried to summarize Bob Menendez's political talking points in a table below.

Year

Event

1974

Elected to Union City Board of Education

1986

He Became Mayor of Union City

1987

Elected to New Jersey General Assembly

1991

Elected to the New Jersey State Senate

1992

Elected to the US House of Representatives

2006

Appointed to the US Senate

2013

Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

2015

Faced with Federal Corruption Charges

2017

Corruption Trial Ends in Mistrial

2018

Re-elected to the US Senate

2021

Re-elected Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

2023

Faces New Federal Corruption Charges

When we evaluate this table together with the previous table on Turkey-US relations, it seems like an interesting coincidence that the negative developments in the relations between the two countries coincide with the years when Bob Menendez started to be influential in the US in his political career. However, due to Menendez's close ties with corruption, bribery and lobbies, this coincidence seems more like a purposeful move. The possibility that Menendez may have been protected, especially with the interesting developments in the judicial process, makes it more likely that he was an organizer than an actor. Or at least a politician who pursued his own personal interests under the influence of political corruption and pursued policies favorable to the powerful Armenian, Greek and Israeli lobbies in the US. Unfortunately, I do not have the opportunity to prove these allegations here, which have not been proven even within the US judicial system. But in my opinion, Menendez and his wife seem to have less chance of escaping the curse of the Egyptian gold.

Pashinyan's Diplomatic Realism and Realpolitik: Ukraine's Lessons Shape Armenia's Stance on Turkey




Abstract: This article takes a comprehensive look at the recent policies and statements of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and analyzes them from a geopolitical perspective. 

In the complex arena of international relations, the experiences of one nation are carefully monitored by other countries, shaping the strategies and decisions of its leaders. This is also true for Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. Among the intricate web of geopolitics, Pashinyan closely monitors the complex relationship between Ukraine and Russia. When tensions between these neighboring states reached a boiling point, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's efforts to counter Russian influence, Pashinyan took careful note. However, it was not just the rhetoric and showmanship that caught Pashinyan's attention, but rather the sudden withdrawal of what was touted as unlimited support and the harsh realities that followed. This left Ukraine suddenly alone with its powerful neighbor. In the wake of this geopolitical drama, Pashinyan drew valuable lessons from Ukraine's fate to shape Armenia's delicate relationship with its regional power Turkey.


On the geopolitical stage, promises are often made with grand gestures and resounding declarations. This is the case for Ukraine, a country that has become a target of great power rivalry, and for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who finds himself in the midst of growing tensions with Russia. In the face of Russian aggression, the imperialist states have promised token aid, military support and endless solidarity with Ukraine and its struggling leader. However, as the conflict unfolded and the stakes rose, once prominent allies faded into the background, their promises of support ringing hollow in the ears of Ukrainian officials. As Ukraine was abandoned by those who once promised unwavering support, it found itself alone in the face of a growing existential threat, and the disappointment was all the more palpable. This betrayal left a lasting mark on the international stage and became a cautionary tale for countries in the region, such as Armenia. As he watched Ukraine's alliances unravel, Nikol Pashinyan highlighted the dangers of relying too heavily on the promises of imperialist powers.


Before moving on to Pashinyan's major shift in Armenian policies, let us take a look at the historical perspective of the issue. Otherwise, a change in policy more than 100 years after the events could be explained by economic difficulties, geopolitical imperatives or shifting alliance relations. But the geopolitical situation before the events took place and the words of the political leader of modern Armenia, who witnessed the events with his own eyes, can only be based on facts. Let us therefore allow history to bear first-hand witness.


The Armenian race is known throughout history as a people inhabiting various parts of Anatolia, the Caucasus and the Middle East. Armenians, the heirs of the Urartu Kingdom in ancient times, established the independent Armenian Kingdom in the 6th century BC. In 301, it became the first state in the world to adopt Christianity as the state religion. In the Middle Ages, Armenians lived under Byzantine, Persian and Arab rule, and after the Seljuk conquest of Anatolia in the 11th century, Armenians lived under the patronage of various principalities and kingdoms. From the 16th century onwards, they came under the rule of the Ottoman Empire.


During the Ottoman Empire, Armenians were one of the loyal nations known as "millet-i sadıka (the faithful nation)", a Christian minority that generally lived in various parts of the empire. Armenians played important roles, especially in the fields of trade, crafts and education. However, towards the end of the 19th century, under the influence of nationalist movements, some Armenian groups demanded independence. During this period, there were tensions and rebellions between the Ottoman administration and some Armenian groups. 


Before the First World War, the Ottoman Empire was weakened by economic problems, nationalist movements and territorial losses. While demoralized after the Balkan Wars, reform efforts and the search for alliances continued. While struggling with these difficulties, the Empire entered the war against all objections, or more accurately, was forced to enter the war by Britain and Germany.


During the years of the First World War, the Ottoman Empire faced serious challenges on both domestic and foreign fronts. In 1915, the invasion of Eastern Anatolia by the Russian Empire and the attacks on Ottoman soldiers and civilians by some Armenian gangs collaborating with the Russian occupation caused great turmoil in the region. These attacks led to civilian organization and acts of revenge among the Muslim population. The Ottoman government took the decision of deportation (forced migration), which aimed to remove the Armenian population from the war zones, in order to control this situation, to ensure the safety of all people and to ensure internal security. The realities of war, poverty, hunger and disease along the route that Armenians had to follow during this deportation were the most formidable threats to this migration. During the deportation, the Empire was unable to provide adequate assistance and thousands of Armenians lost their lives due to malnutrition, disease and harsh conditions. Among the places of displacement were the desert regions of Syria. This process seems to have laid the foundation for historical traumas in Turkish-Armenian relations.


But could what actually happened have been manipulated by imperialist states in order to foment enmity between the two peoples and prepare a favorable environment in which they can realize their own ambitions? Let us seek the answer to this question together below.


In April 1923, the Dashnaktsutyun Party's report "Dashnaktsutyun Has Nothing More to Do" was presented to the Dashnaktsutyun Party's Conference Abroad in Bucharest under the signature of Hovhannes Katchaznouni, the first prime minister of the Armenian government and leader of the Dashnaktsutyun Party. In his report, Katchaznouni discusses the state's struggle against the systematic attacks of Armenian gangs on the local population and the forced migrations in the Ottoman Empire in 1915, but does not use the term "genocide" to describe these events. While the report usually describes the events in question with terms such as "catastrophe" or "tragedy", it discusses in detail what happened during this period. Instead of the "Armenian genocide", it emphasizes the great losses and sufferings of the Armenians and the strategic mistakes of the party in this process. Although the tragic consequences of the events are emphasized in this report, in which Katchaznouni is self-critical and questions the party policies, it is very striking that the term "genocide" is not used directly. 


An English edition of this book was published in 1955 in New York by the Armenian Information Service (Armenian Intelligence Service) under the title "The Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaksoution) Has Nothing To Do Any More". However, this English publication did not contain the entire book. The Armenian intelligence service had removed the parts that they found objectionable. In the same way, the originals of the book were collected from European libraries by the Armenian diaspora. Interestingly, in these libraries, the name of the book appeared in the catalogs, but there was no trace of the books on the shelves. It is only natural that this historical report of the first Armenian prime minister was banned in Armenia, and later, in the form of books published in various languages, it was collected from European libraries and made a banned publication in Armenia. It is also known that the publications were collected from European libraries by the Dashnak Party. However, the Russian edition of the book that the Dashnaks forgot to destroy was found in the Lenin Library in Moscow and translated into Turkish by Dr. Arif Acaloğlu. As we always encounter, the truth has a way of coming out one day!


In the following years, Prof. Dr. Türkkaya Ataöv's English article introducing this report was published in French, German and Spanish translations.

[Prof. Dr. Türkkaya Ataöv, An Armenian Source: Hovhannes Katchaznouni; Une Source Armenienne: Hovhannes Katchaznouni: Eine armenische Quelle: Hovhannes Katchaznouni; Fuenta Armenia: Hovhannes Katchaznouni; Second Printing, Ankara, March 1995]


Now let us examine the content of this report. In his report, then Prime Minister Katchaznouni says; "The British occupation had raised the hopes of the Dashnaks again. Because the British had occupied Istanbul at that time and had established a 'Dashnak dictatorship' in Armenia. We were unconditionally oriented towards Russia. Without any justification, we were in a triumphal mood. We were sure that in return for our loyalty, our work and our help, the tsarist government would grant us the independence of Armenia. In the summer and fall of 1915, the Turks subjected the Armenians to a forced deportation. The Turks knew what they were doing and today they have nothing to regret. We participated in military operations. We were deceived and tied to Russia. The deportation was right and necessary. We failed to see the facts, we are the cause of the events. The Turks' national struggle was justified. It was a big mistake to refuse peace and take up arms. We revolted and fought against the Turks. Our rebellion was based on the dream of a great Armenia promised to us by the Entente powers. It was as if our short-sightedness was a heroism, because everyone who wanted to, the French, the British, the Americans, the Georgians, the Bolsheviks, the whole world, easily deceived, dodged and betrayed us, while we were naively convinced that this war was being fought for the Armenians. We were now all in the camp of the Allied Powers, the enemies of the Turks, demanding 'Armenia from sea to sea' from the Turks. Finally, there is the fact that as long as we have existed, we have been fighting, killing and dying with the Turks non-stop. What confidence can we inspire in the Turks now? Do not look for blame outside the Dashnak leadership..."


It is noteworthy that the term "genocide" does not appear anywhere in these words, which were uttered while the events were still fresh. Why did Katchaznouni, the head of the Armenians, carefully choose his words and take most of the blame, even though he felt the full power of imperialism behind him at the congress, which took place at a time when the new Turkish state was still in its infancy and weak, and Armenian nationalism was on the rise? This is a great virtue as well as the ability to look at events objectively despite all the circumstances.


At this stage, I would like to talk a little bit about Hovhannes Katchaznouni. Katchaznouni was the first prime minister of the Armenian state established in July 1918. He led the Dashnak government for 13 months until August 1919. He was one of the founders and an important leader of the Dashnaktsutyun Party. He is the highest authority of Armenia and the Dashnak Party. He was born in 1867 in the Meskhetian region of Georgia. After studying architecture, he worked as an architect in Baku. There he joined the Dashnak organization. In 1917, he became a member of the Armenian National Council. Until 1918, he was a Dashnak representative in the Caucasus parliament (Seym). He took part in the Armenian delegation during the peace negotiations with the Turks in Trabzon and Batumi. When the Caucasus state disintegrated, he became the first prime minister of independent Armenia in July 1918. He remained in this position until August 1919. In 1920, after the Bolshevik government was established in Armenia, he was arrested. In 1921, during the counter-revolution against Bolshevik rule, he fled the country after the suppression of the uprising. Years later, he returned to Soviet Armenia and worked as an architect until his death in 1938. 


Let us now turn to Pashinyan's statements that form the basis of his new policies. Regarding Armenian policies and the genocide allegations, Pashinyan said the following: "We became victims of intrigues and false promises. This large-scale tragedy took place during the First World War, and the Armenian people, who had no state, who had lost their state centuries ago, and who had essentially forgotten the tradition of statehood, became victims of geopolitical intrigues and false promises, first and foremost because they lacked a political mind capable of making sense of the world and its rules.”


So, what was Pashinyan's main emphasis when he said this? Clarifying Armenia's borders and pursuing a realistic foreign policy by accepting these borders, rejecting the historical dreams of "Greater Armenia" and focusing on protecting and developing the existing borders. Pashinyan also emphasized that he has put an end to the dreams of "Greater Armenia" and that such dreams cannot be realized. While stating that the focus should be on Armenia's existing borders and territories, he argues that Armenia has created an unlivable environment by establishing hostile relations with its neighbors. While stating that Armenia cannot be enemies with millions of Turks and other neighboring countries, he emphasizes that Armenia should focus on protecting and developing its existing borders. In his recent rhetoric, Pashinyan explains that Armenia's current borders are determined by maps from the Soviet Union. This statement means that Armenia's borders have been clarified and disputed territorial claims have ended. Moreover, the Prime Minister argues that this clarification will end Armenia's hostile relations with its neighbors and create a more peaceful environment. On the other hand, Pashinyan, like Katchaznouni, argues that the events of 1915 should be characterized as a "great catastrophe" and that genocide allegations should be put aside, stating that the Ottoman Empire did not commit genocide against the Armenians and that this claim was used by the Soviet Union as a policy tool against Turkey and furthermore, that it was put forward by the Soviet Union to advance its policies against Turkey. This approach aims to improve Armenia's modern relations and end ideological conflicts based on the 1915 events. Stating that the ideological framing of the 1915 events is detrimental to Armenia's modern development and that this issue should be consigned to history, Pashinyan also emphasizes that Armenia should open up to the West and build good relations with Turkey to enhance its efforts to ensure regional peace and stability. Pashinyan thus aims for Armenia's independence and the ability to make its own decisions by getting rid of the influence of the diaspora. In this context, he also states that Armenia has taken further steps towards resolving its relations and border disputes with Azerbaijan.


Let's analyze the issue in more detail. Pashinyan, as an intelligent, successful politician who cares about the future of his people, saw the game being played early on and found the future of his people in maintaining good relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan rather than throwing himself in front of the front line by falling for the fancy lies of the "organizers" in order not to fall into the same situation, which already means a policy in line with Turkey's calls for many years.


Pashinyan's bold and revolutionary statements reveal the need to build a new paradigm of relations for Armenia's future. Challenging Russia and trying to set a new direction in Caucasus geopolitics, Pashinyan loudly expresses the truths that his people will hardly accept and aims to back up these truths.


These events and rhetoric are very similar to what Zelensky has been facing and what he has been saying lately, right? The difference, of course, is that for Zelensky the end seems to be in sight.


As a result, for the first time in history, Pashinyan seems to have made an effort to define Armenia's borders, to put an end to the dreams of a "Greater Armenia" and to ease tensions with radical and bold statements on the 1915 genocide allegations. The reality is that these statements give the opportunity to elaborate on their possible positive impact on Armenia's future and its efforts to open up to the West.


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan's revolutionary policies and statements, which include significant changes for the future of Armenia, reflect Armenia's efforts to clarify its borders, which were disputed in the past, and the concrete steps taken in this regard, and draw a new road map for the future of Armenia.


Turkey is endeavoring to transform its relations with Armenia from an environment of hostility and turmoil to an axis of friendship, partnership and trade according to the geopolitical realities of the 21st century. This seems inevitable given the gains that the regional geography will realize in the long run. In line with the policies of Turkey and neighboring countries, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan seems to see common regional development within the framework of friendship. Unfortunately, this situation does not seem to be to the liking of the imperialist states that are trying to create chaos among the regional states.


Who knows, there may be more political assassinations in the region in the coming period.